Pattern Recognition, by William Gibson
by Bennett Holzworth, (2 comments)

This book was vastly different from the last book I reviewed, Ella Minnow Pea. Where Ella Minnow Pea was classic, Pattern Recognition was every bit of sub and pop culture jammed into one novel. William Gibson went into great detail, while Mark Dunn simplified his writing to only the essential letters. Having said that, I still think this was a good book.
This is my first William Gibson book, and apparently this is his first non-science fiction book. The main character, Cayce Pollard, is a “cool hunter” that has flown to London to approve or reject a new logo for the world’s second largest shoe manufacturer. In her free time, Cayce is following a phenomenon as it unfolds one download at a time. She is part of an every growing online forum that is avidly following some enigmatic, unanimous film that is being distributed via the web, one segment at a time. Nobody can figure out where this film is being made, how it is made and most of all, who is making it. Cayce’s life gets more and more interesting as her personal and professional life are forced together. This story is definitely set up much like a suspense movie, which of course makes it not that surprising that it is going to be made into a movie. I’m not sure if the fact that I knew it was going to be made into a movie before I read the book was influential in the way I read it or not. None the less, it will be interesting to see the movie.
I read this book after reading Jessica Helfand’s Design Observer post on Cat Woman and graphic designers being represented on the big screen. Jessica was hopeful that a designer would have a good portrayal when Pattern Recognition was released in the theaters. While Cayce Pollard isn’t exactly a graphic designer, I am still anxious to see something related to graphic design represented in Hollywood.
Like I mentioned before, Cayce is a cool hunter, visiting the cultural centers of the world and recognizing patterns before anyone else does. She then sells her knowledge to the fashion and design industry. I would be skeptical wether this was an actual profession, but after reading Malcolm Gladwell’s The Tipping Point I know this career is not fiction. Fascinating life. I wouldn’t mind giving that career a try. Sorry, back on topic. The thing that makes Cayce highly attuned to logo design is her severe allergy to established logos. When she sees one of these aforementioned marks, she experiences something like a panic attack. With this “gift” she can look at a newly designed logo and immediately tell wether it will work or not. She is hired by a multi-national ad agency in London to use this talent on a new logo for the second largest shoe manufacturer. Cayce’s agreement with the agency is that she just has to say “it will work” or “it won’t work”. They can’t ask her for reasoning or anything else. With her track record she apparently doesn’t need a reason or even know how to defend her decision. She just knows. Haven’t we all heard that before? I think I speak for most graphic designers out there, that I am glad this character doesn’t really exist. I would hate her so much. All the designers work and thought, and all she has to do is say “yes” or “no”. Not exactly my idea of where graphic design should be going, but it works for the book. Of course, I think any designer would like the power and authority that Cayce has in these situations. Maybe I will start telling clients that I have an allergy that makes me highly aware and acutely accurate.
Now on to Mr. Gibson’s writing. It took me a while to get used to his writing style. There where so many times that I had to re-read the beginning of a chapter, just to figure out what was going on. I think many times he would start a chapter or section out this way to confuse and disorient the reader. Much like what Cayce was experiencing with jet-lag. A paragraph or so later it would become apparent what was going on. Another frustrating element in this book is all the random references. They were usually references about some designer or label that a cool hunter would surely know. Sometimes these annoyed me, mainly when I didn’t get the reference, but most reinforced that Gibson had done his research of current style, trend, etc. Of course it was rewarding when I did recognize the name of the designer or artist he was referring to.
This book is worth a read. I can tell that Mr. Gibson has written in the sci-fi category, but he was definitely convincing as someone who is active and aware of trends, fashion, design and marketing. He gives ad agencies a great deal of credit for their influence in today’s society. It would be interesting to see how much power these mega-agencies actually yield.
Overall: A fun and fascinating book to read. Most of what I reviewed here was in the plot set-up. The actual conflict does get a bit more exciting than approving logos and downloading movie clips. As exciting as that is in real life for designers, I don’t think that would have made a very interesting work of fiction.

Comments (2)
Adrian said:
Cayce sounds like an interesting character. If she did exist, I think I would also claim to have that allergy. Wouldn’t it be great to just be able to give a logo to a client with the condition that they can’t ask you any questions or give you any feedback? Maybe we aren’t allergic to bad logos, but the much of the way we rate logos as graphic designers is based on an intuitive gut level. We know good logos when we see them without having to read the 2 page creative rational that accompanied the logo during the approval process. The majority of clients don’t have this skill, and don’t want to rely on the gut feeling of an agency. So, we write the creative rational, quote statistics and numbers, and present target demographic research as an afterthought in order to reassure the client. It doesn’t change the way the logo was created, but it is the only way we can get the client to believe they are getting what they paid for. It is the only way we can get the absolute power that Cayce has to say say “this will work” but “this won’t” without saying we are allergic to bad logos.
Posted on August 2, 2004
Adrian Hanft said:
Here is a page I read today about Pattern Recognition becoming a movie:
http://battellemedia.com/archives/000985.php
Posted on October 22, 2004