DesignOff! 2005 Round Seven: Rain Delay
by Nate Voss, (7 comments)
![365-25-Poster_Round7[nv].gif](http://www.beadesigngroup.com/blog/archives/365-25-Poster_Round7%5Bnv%5D.gif)
From DesignOff! 2005 Round One: “The design will begin when Nate sends Bennett the first draft at high noon on Tuesday, June 21 and end when Bennett sends the final design to Nate on Tuesday, July 5. Designers will have no more than 48 hours each round to turn in their drafts to the other designer”
When the project that consumed my life during last week is printed and delivered, I will share the experience with all of you. For the time being, I can only say that my schedule was out of my hands (and firmly in my client’s).
I was not thrilled with a few of the new images Bennett had selected. The reasoning behind all the previous selections was to give a face for the viewer to identify with. This is what made Caramba! Girl the ideal image for the 1st hierarchy position (orange photo). Then, when we found that many of our images were, in fact, a part of a separate exhibition, we had to make some changes. In Round Six, we lost some great images for a few, less emotionally identifiable, images. I only had to remove one: the sea horse, my favorite. The line-screen we now have in place for printing purposes blew out the image completely and rendered it unusable.
Looking for faces I found few in the Design Archives. Few, save for the MTV Movie Awards work designed by MTV Networks, New York. The big head posters. There were four; Chris Rock, Britney Spears, Ozzy, and Snoop Doggy Dog. Narrowing the choice to Britney and Snoop, I did some test market research.
Do Nebraska designers respond better to an image of Britney Spears or Snoop Dog? Market research concludes that 9 out of 10 prefer Snoop, and the remainder chose Prince over Britney, who wasn’t even included in the survey.
Then disaster stuck. The same calamity that befell the sea horse image, befell Snoop’s Giant Head. The line screen did a reverse blow-out and his “face” was unrecognizable. I spent several rounds in Photoshop before attempting the Britney head. That one worked. Reluctantly, I choose readability over market-research. A Giant Snoop Head that is unrecognizable as a Giant Snoop Head is scarcely a Giant Snoop Head at all. When I sent the files to Bennett on Friday, I included the ill-fated Snoop Head image as well, in case he would choose to replace it.

Comments (7)
Donovan Beery said:
I think the copy that says “to purchase a limited edition print” should be altered to mention it’s letterpressed. The URL to use would be: nebraska.aiga.org/merchandise/
To be fair, Britney probably represents 2004 (what this exhibit presents) better than Snoop, but not 2005. I think the information of the year must have been missing when asking your focus group.
Posted on July 10, 2005
nate said:
Well, it was a double-blind focus group. They didn’t know much about the subject at hand when asked for their response.
Thanks for the link, Donovan. We should ALL hits that Merchandise page. There’s some exceptionally pretty stuff in there.
Posted on July 10, 2005
Travis said:
Ummmm….the DesignOff is great and everything, but maybe reduce the size of your images in your posts? or try to make it so that the image enlarges when clicked on? the size of the images on the main page are getting a little out of hand (and repetitive.)
Posted on July 11, 2005
nate said:
Sure thing. I’ll get right on that.
Posted on July 11, 2005
Drew Davies said:
Since this is indeed a forum inviting public critique, I have to mention that I find it pretty awkward that Briney’s head is the only “historic event” stepping outside of the standard circles. (I know one of the other heads lets its hair just slightly break the circle, but the basic shape is still defined.) Am I being overly rigid, or does anyone else find this uncomfortable?
Also, the name of our firm is officially “Oxide Design Co.” I’d love to have it listed as such on the poster if at all possible.
Posted on July 12, 2005
JonSel said:
To Drew’s point, I guess I also wonder why there’s only one orange image with the rest in purple.
Posted on July 12, 2005
nate said:
To JonSel’s point: Focus, hierarchy, and correspondence of image to text. See Round 5.
Posted on July 12, 2005