<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chip Kidd: Partially Exposed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beadesigngroup.com/blog/archives/2005/10/chip-kidd-partially-exposed.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beadesigngroup.com/blog/archives/2005/10/chip-kidd-partially-exposed.php</link>
	<description>A blog for graphic designers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 20:52:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bennett</title>
		<link>http://www.beadesigngroup.com/blog/archives/2005/10/chip-kidd-partially-exposed.php/comment-page-1#comment-1858</link>
		<dc:creator>Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 21:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beadesigngroup.com/2005/10/26/chip-kidd-partially-exposed/#comment-1858</guid>
		<description>I think the term &quot;good&quot; can be very easily interchanged with average. i.e. &quot;Good enough&quot; I agree that it is more of a statement about being &quot;Great&quot; and not just good. I can&#039;t say that I love the phrase. &quot;good is dead&quot;, but I doubt Chip really cares what most people think. He would probably rather ruffle up some feathers and get a discussion going. Make people scratch their heads. I&#039;m not sure if it makes the most sense for a website, but I wasn&#039;t offended. At least when you go to chipkidd.com it redirects you to goodisdead.com. Chip Kidd is predictably unpredictable.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the term &#8220;good&#8221; can be very easily interchanged with average. i.e. &#8220;Good enough&#8221; I agree that it is more of a statement about being &#8220;Great&#8221; and not just good. I can&#8217;t say that I love the phrase. &#8220;good is dead&#8221;, but I doubt Chip really cares what most people think. He would probably rather ruffle up some feathers and get a discussion going. Make people scratch their heads. I&#8217;m not sure if it makes the most sense for a website, but I wasn&#8217;t offended. At least when you go to chipkidd.com it redirects you to goodisdead.com. Chip Kidd is predictably unpredictable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DC1974</title>
		<link>http://www.beadesigngroup.com/blog/archives/2005/10/chip-kidd-partially-exposed.php/comment-page-1#comment-1857</link>
		<dc:creator>DC1974</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 18:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beadesigngroup.com/2005/10/26/chip-kidd-partially-exposed/#comment-1857</guid>
		<description>Simanek seems to have it right based on the Cheese Monkey review at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eyemagazine.com/critique.php?cid=112&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Eye&lt;/a&gt;. Although, I would add that Kidd is big here too. And certainly among design students coming out right now. I&#039;d also ad that I&#039;m not sure that you understand Japanese culture really well, but that&#039;s another thought entirely.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simanek seems to have it right based on the Cheese Monkey review at <a href="http://www.eyemagazine.com/critique.php?cid=112" rel="nofollow">Eye</a>. Although, I would add that Kidd is big here too. And certainly among design students coming out right now. I&#8217;d also ad that I&#8217;m not sure that you understand Japanese culture really well, but that&#8217;s another thought entirely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.beadesigngroup.com/blog/archives/2005/10/chip-kidd-partially-exposed.php/comment-page-1#comment-1856</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 17:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beadesigngroup.com/2005/10/26/chip-kidd-partially-exposed/#comment-1856</guid>
		<description>I guess that makes sense. In the context of Cheese Monkeys, it seemed to be a more dark and subversive message. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.beadesigngroup.com/blog/archives/2004/05/cheese_monkeys.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;(We debate that here.)&lt;/a&gt; Just as a web address, it doesn&#039;t give us much context to understand what it means. I guess the reason it bothers me is because I don&#039;t think of the word &quot;good&quot; to mean &quot;average.&quot; For me, something is either good or it isn&#039;t. Married with that is a moral commitment to strive for good (as opposed to evil) in everything I do. In that context, I find the statement &quot;Good is Dead&quot; to be personally offensive. I guess it shouldn&#039;t bother me if Kidd doesn&#039;t mean it that way. Still, I would like to hear that definition from Kidd before I accept it off as a &quot;good is the enemy of great&quot; statement.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess that makes sense. In the context of Cheese Monkeys, it seemed to be a more dark and subversive message. <a href="http://www.beadesigngroup.com/blog/archives/2004/05/cheese_monkeys.html" rel="nofollow">(We debate that here.)</a> Just as a web address, it doesn&#8217;t give us much context to understand what it means. I guess the reason it bothers me is because I don&#8217;t think of the word &#8220;good&#8221; to mean &#8220;average.&#8221; For me, something is either good or it isn&#8217;t. Married with that is a moral commitment to strive for good (as opposed to evil) in everything I do. In that context, I find the statement &#8220;Good is Dead&#8221; to be personally offensive. I guess it shouldn&#8217;t bother me if Kidd doesn&#8217;t mean it that way. Still, I would like to hear that definition from Kidd before I accept it off as a &#8220;good is the enemy of great&#8221; statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leMel</title>
		<link>http://www.beadesigngroup.com/blog/archives/2005/10/chip-kidd-partially-exposed.php/comment-page-1#comment-1855</link>
		<dc:creator>leMel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 00:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beadesigngroup.com/2005/10/26/chip-kidd-partially-exposed/#comment-1855</guid>
		<description>Um...he&#039;s branding.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um&#8230;he&#8217;s branding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simanek</title>
		<link>http://www.beadesigngroup.com/blog/archives/2005/10/chip-kidd-partially-exposed.php/comment-page-1#comment-1854</link>
		<dc:creator>Simanek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 00:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beadesigngroup.com/2005/10/26/chip-kidd-partially-exposed/#comment-1854</guid>
		<description>He is saying that what has been considered &#039;good&#039; design in the past he doesn&#039;t consider &#039;good&#039; anymore. Perhaps if what is good looks like something that already exists, then the term &#039;good&#039; really means &#039;familiar, accepted and agreed upon by people that know as correct&#039;. (Such as the &#039;appropriate&#039; use of ligatures and em and en dashes, for example.) He&#039;s a self-proclaimed avant-garde designer. He&#039;s saying that he&#039;s not just a &#039;good&#039; designer, but a designer that is making something altogether new and different that, to the uneducated eye, might not look &#039;good&#039;. Pretty standard Modern art philosophy. Most likely he&#039;s big in Japan.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He is saying that what has been considered &#8216;good&#8217; design in the past he doesn&#8217;t consider &#8216;good&#8217; anymore. Perhaps if what is good looks like something that already exists, then the term &#8216;good&#8217; really means &#8216;familiar, accepted and agreed upon by people that know as correct&#8217;. (Such as the &#8216;appropriate&#8217; use of ligatures and em and en dashes, for example.) He&#8217;s a self-proclaimed avant-garde designer. He&#8217;s saying that he&#8217;s not just a &#8216;good&#8217; designer, but a designer that is making something altogether new and different that, to the uneducated eye, might not look &#8216;good&#8217;. Pretty standard Modern art philosophy. Most likely he&#8217;s big in Japan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DC1974</title>
		<link>http://www.beadesigngroup.com/blog/archives/2005/10/chip-kidd-partially-exposed.php/comment-page-1#comment-1853</link>
		<dc:creator>DC1974</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 16:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beadesigngroup.com/2005/10/26/chip-kidd-partially-exposed/#comment-1853</guid>
		<description>Perhaps its a play on the old aphorism &quot;good is the enemy of great&quot; combined with a play on God is Dead?! Just thinking out loud here.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps its a play on the old aphorism &#8220;good is the enemy of great&#8221; combined with a play on God is Dead?! Just thinking out loud here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.beadesigngroup.com/blog/archives/2005/10/chip-kidd-partially-exposed.php/comment-page-1#comment-1852</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 00:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beadesigngroup.com/2005/10/26/chip-kidd-partially-exposed/#comment-1852</guid>
		<description>It really bugs me that his website is &quot;Good is Dead.&quot; Other than Cheese Monkeys, has anyone seen another place where he talks about or explains that phrase?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really bugs me that his website is &#8220;Good is Dead.&#8221; Other than Cheese Monkeys, has anyone seen another place where he talks about or explains that phrase?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

