« An Open Letter From the Public to Designers | Main | Be A Design Cast 9 : Spec Work »

For the love of a brand

by , (21 comments)


Panera_02_sm.jpgTonight I visited my extended neighborhood’s first Panera Bread bakery cafe. For those of you in southern California, it’s at Foothill and Haven in Rancho Cucamonga. For those of you in St. Louis, Nebraska, and many other areas, this is probably a dead topic. “Mine” opened less than a week ago. Although we’ve already covered Panera’s holiday designs, I can’t help but express how much the design part of my brain thanks me for going there. Every little detail in that place was atteneded to. The running themes in signange—the endless sophisicated menu choices—the special carpet around the long Thanksgiving Dinner family table—the embossed frequent-buyer cards—having lids that actually work for water glasses so that my toddler doesn’t spill them—the artwork on the wall—the great food and service, all supporting the brand.

I distinctly remember sitting at a St. Louis Bread Company about 10 years ago in the area of Creve Coeur as a college freshman with my roommate on Christmas break. I ate a blueberry bagel with veggie cream cheese (weird combo) and commented their menus had a unique style I had never seen. I hung on to that menu all through college, and ended up using it at least once a year as an example for some assignment. Since then, I’ve watched the brand evolve and spread. Evidently The Bread Company changed it’s name to Panera.

I took a few photos with my phone while I was there. 1 2 3 The photos aren’t spectacular, but the drawings are. What restaurants hang framed drawings any more—just cafes and coffee shops?

On a slight tangent, at what point does the spread of Panera become perceived as negatively (by some) as the spread of Starbucks in the last 10 years? Is it just the number, and proximity, of locations? I was thrilled to see Panera open, which was new to my area. How much can they keep expanding without people complaining that these national companies are thwarting their local businesses that have been successful for many years. Obviously, people will complain no matter what you do. Is it justified because Panera respects design so much, has great food, and great service? Starbucks respects design, too, but their coffee isn’t as fresh as my local roaster. Furthermore, does the brand get old and loose it’s effect after a while? Or is signage changed frequently enough to keep you interested?

Anyhow, getting back to the reason I wanted to share all this—my “healing” experience (healing of a mind tired of repetitive design work and yearning for new design) All due to good design? Maybe, but their bread is just as remarkable.

Where else can we go for design “therapy?”

Sponsored by:

Font Burner
contact badg

Comments (21)

Adam said:

I loved this post. I too appreciate their design so much. My wife recently picked up a baker’s dozen and when she got home I was more excited about the packaging than I was for the food. She obviously thought I was nuts, but the detail they even put on the boxes amaze me.

When I visit, I feel right at home, the atmosphere just makes you want to spend time there.

I think the brand will remain strong for years to come, it seems their design changes just enough to keep it interesting, not to mention the food is excellent. It would be another argument if the product sucked.

For design Therapy I would suggest filling your car up with gas, pick a direction, grab a camera and drive till you run out. Stop at every unique place you can, and document the trip with your camera, video camera. Talk to new people. buy the time you end up some where, you’ll see what you were looking for.

DC1974 said:

One factual issue. Panera is the combination of Au Bon Pain (which still exists in numbers around the Washington, DC, area, also has a strong brand and IMHO better food) and the Saint Louis Bread Company. Neither name had much traction outside of regional areas and so Panera was picked to sell it to the rest of country.

DC1974 said:

Gosh. Now. I’VE made the mistake. The Au Bon Pain units are a separate company, again. After the success with the rebranding, the senior management decided that Panera was going to be the better concept. Plus, (I’m sure this was the thinking) no one except us snooty East Coasters can pronounce French words anyway.

This all explains why we have both Au Bon Pain and Panera around here. (Although the Panera locations are newer.)

Kyle said:

Ohhh!! Au Bon Pain. How interesting—thanks for the info. I was quite pleased with their food in some airports, but didn’t get to experience the regional in-store brand.

Nate Voss said:

Ohhhh, I was at an Au Bon Pain in Chicago about 10 years ago. It was a big deal, because it was a huge field trip my French class took, so we had to eat at “Au Bon Pain.” It was pretty good.

Then, while in St. Louis 2 years ago, I experienced St. Louis Bread Co. My mind was blown. Good to get the history. Kyle, you should’ve seen their design work LAST year. That was the hotness.

Bennett said:

Right. Au Bon Pain. I was admiring their stores when I was in Boston about five years ago for a conference. I was impressed that they had a Craig Frazier illustrated coffee mug. Even though I hate coffee, I ordered one just to get the mug.

JonSel said:

because it was a huge field trip my French class took, so we had to eat at “Au Bon Pain.”

Hah. That’s funny. Au Bon Pain, the store, is about as French as Piccadilly Circus.

I wonder if Kyle’s Panera is a newer store concept. The local Panera’s here in NJ look nothing like those photos.

A Panera recently opened up here in CT. The bread is good, and my wife and I go there simply because they never seem to be out of stock and they are open later than local bakeries in our area.

My wife tends to go to Starbucks for her hot chocolate because they open about half an hour earlier than most of the local coffee houses. Their baked products are complete crap.

Neither Panera nor Starbucks offers a product any better than what we can get at a local bakery or coffee shop. Neither of them offers a better design experience than the zillions of local bakeries or coffee houses in the area. Granite counter tops, tile floors, and dark wood trim is nothing new.

It’s the convenience that keeps us going back.

Where else can we go for design “therapy”, you ask?

Try the aisles of your local health food store. They have tons of products from manufacturers you’ve probably never heard of before. Some well designed packaging, some not so good.

Bennett said:

Steven, I can’t speak for your local shops, but I’ve rarely seen anything local that is as well designed as the mentioned franchises. Well … I guess it all depends on your perception of good design. If it is authenticity then I think local bakeries and coffee shops compete very well. If you are talking about use of lighting, color, typography, photography of products, uniforms, packaging, interior design … then the Paneras and Starbucks win 9 times out of 10 in my experience. The chain stores have to create the atmosphere that already exists in the local shop.

“The chain stores have to create the atmosphere that already exists in the local shop.”

Interesting. Maybe there is an element of regionalism that national chains need consider?

Maybe we should start a photo gallery of local coffee shops, or publish a coffee table book of local coffee shops? :)

What’s cool about some local coffee shops here is that they display and sell the works of local artists. So some of the local coffee shops have that aura of an art gallery to them.

Bennett said:

Steven, I hadn’t thought about this until you mentioned the idea of regionalism for national chains, but GAP is planning to do exactly this. I think I heard the story on Market Place. Since GAP isn’t doing so well, and they are losing market share to small boutique shops, they are planning a major redesign of their stores. They talked about making GAP not appear so big and national. I didn’t hear much about the specifics, but they talked about not making them so bright and airy. I’m not sure if they will try to make stores look different depending on the region, but they are going to try to look more boutique. It will be interesting to see what they do.

Bennett said:

Here is an article on some of the problems GAP is having. Not much of the article focuses on the store redesign, but here is a quote. “The new look includes dark-colored wood floors, coffee tables, softer lighting and spacious fitting rooms.”

GAP better do something. They’re suffering from a severe identity crisis. I’m not even sure who their target audience is anymore. Ten/twelve years ago they used to sell somewhat conservative style clothes that seemed to cater to the suburban preppy/yuppie crowd, which their classic navy blue and white logo reflects. Heck, that logo screams Ivy League chic!

Old Navy now has the budget line and Banana Republic seems to cater to upper-middle class casual dress working professionals. Where does the GAP fit in? Who are they trying to target?

I guess by redesigning their shops to reflect a more intimate boutique atmosphere, they are trying to attract a higher-end crowd, but the clothing styles I think miss the mark.

Like you said, it will be interesting to see what they do — and if it works.

DC1974 said:

I was in the GAP the other day. And although I still like their store designs and will be sad to see that change — the product STUNK. there was no cohesion, no over all theme. it was like 18 different creative directors had control over the product. it’s a complete mish-mash. and it was so jarring. and none of it was at all well designed. it was like they were trying to hit every conceivable trend. i bet they are smarting over letting drexler go. he’s over at j. crew now and has completely turned around their product. the GAP brought in a guy from Disney or Pepsi or some place like that that has to be all things to all people. you can’t do that with clothing. and j. crew, the limited companies and H&M are handing GAP their arses right now.

Chris Rugen said:

It’s been a while since I was in a Panera, but their aesthetic bugs me, actually. It’s not poorly executed and their food is certainly tasty, but they have that ‘everything has been designified to harmoniously give you a Branded Experience’ look that gives me the willies. Everything, to my recollection, is designed to look like it’s been crafted and artfully done, but it hasn’t. Everything there has a cheeky little quirky touch to it and my brain screams “too much!” (I prefer Starbucks’ atmosphere.)

I think Bennett hit it on the head: it’s looser authenticity vs. controlled consistency, for the most part. And everyone’s got a preference. However, I’d argue that authenticity is not the whole thing. Some local places have a form-follows-function appeal to them that I like: the coffee shop evolves because of customer and employee habits and that creates it own consistency. But there are some skeezy local places I avoid because they have an unpleasant atmosphere or do a poor job of aping chain stores; authenticity doesn’t equal goodness.

Full disclosure: I admit to a pretty rampant streak of localism and small business orthodoxy lately, because I live in a community with a higher-than-average amount of that and I’m a bit sensitive to that stuff now.

Kyle said:

When I walked around inside Panera, snapping photos of the drawings, I was assuming that these very same drawings were in another Panera coming soon nearby, just like this one. Hopefully not, but, probably.

I read an article in Wired just about 3 months back that talked about Best Buy testing a directed rebrand of it national chain into 3 niche stores. One for busy soccer moms, with tons of helpful people and cozy colors. Their kids had spaces in the store to try out video games (and convince their mom to buy them). There were two other stores, too, disguised to look like kind of like a new local store, but I don’t recall what they were called.

Rebranding (or sub-branding?) like this isn’t new. Has anyone experienced The Great Indoors? I stepped inside a few years ago. What I took away from it was: overpriced Sears merchandise, targeted to rich people way above my head. I practically ran out.

JonSel said:

I’ve been to The Great Indoors. Not a good buying experience. They seemed like a less expensive version of Home Depot Expo. Lots of similar merchandise with a slightly lower price point. But, like Expo, the customer service was dreadful. I enjoy a nice branded experience, and I especially like getting a lot under one roof (yes, that’s the suburban almost-dad in me talking), but bad customer service is the death of any brand.

JWR said:

the gap sucks big time! i am shocked that they are losing to small boutiques… i have given up the gap for TARGET! great clothes, good prices, and they ALWAYS HAVE MY SIZE…

speaking of target.. i also believe that the in-store experience at target is great.. their signage is delightful… never make it out of their without spending more money than i had intended…

Speaking of customer service as part of the branding experience, so many large chains just don’t get it. Home Depot especially. Growing up I worked at a local hardware store that was known for its customer service. Customer service isn’t only about helping people find and use products, it’s about being able to easily and quickly return or exchange an item if it doesn’t work properly.

I’ve stood in those exchange return lines at Home Depot. They treat you as if you’re trying to rip them off and make the exchange/return as grueling of an experience as possible.

I undertand that there are some bad seeds out there that will try and take advantage of you, but you have to simply let them go. Don’t ruin the experience for every customer because you will lose some of the good ones.

Speaking of Target, their customer service is awesome!

Bennett said:

Since we are talking about GAP … I can’t use their website in Safari. How is that for customer service? It looks like I have to upgrade to Tiger (one of these days I will do it) to be able to give them money. I have to spend money to spend money.

Their website works on Firefox, but Firefox drives me crazy with my Mighty Mouse (Maybe it will work better when I upgrade to Tiger as well).

It just seems ignorant to make consumers work to spend money on your site. Especially with a browser that is so widely used on Macs.

Anonymous said:

http://www.batterylaptoppower.com/toshiba/pa3382u-1bas.htm toshiba pa3382u-1bas battery ,


Post a comment


Make sure you understand our COMMENT POLICY before you comment. If you haven't left a comment here before, your comment may need to be approved before it will be published. Once it has been approved, it will appear on this entry. Thanks for waiting.