My Typographic Reeducation: Part 3 of 11
by Nate Voss, (6 comments)

UPDATED AGAIN! This week we add a little more complexity to our extremely limited assignment from last week, and I drop an in-class assignment on my students… which I then have to sit down and do right along with them.
The Assignment: Using five typefaces now (Garamond, Baskerville, Bodoni, Serfia, and Univers), draw five compositions representing opposition, tension, overlapping, details, and scale. 2” x 2” size, for a total of 25 compositions. At this point you may use any weight or other variation of the typeface design (ie: Bold, Semibold, Semibold Italic, etc).
Old Lesson 2: Things are easier with less options. Last week we did more sketches, but with only the Roman character set available it was easier to move ahead. Now, with typefaces such as Univers (63 different styles!), there were almost too many options to move forward. I wound up limiting myself to a simple Roman/Italic/Bold/Bold Italic set because a.) It was easier, and b.) Still within the scope of the assignment.
New Lesson 2: This week was all about type identification. Even when I was in school I never got a hold of things like Modern, Old Style, Transitional, etc. when it came to type design. I knew two things: Serif and Sans Serif. You’ll be happy to know it is possible to build a career with that knowledge, but it always hung on me like a secret albatross whenever my typographic friends would start chatting. This week I’ve finally cut the chord on that stupid bird, and have already begun wowing my financé by calling out the Old Style and Transitional typefaces used on the “Help Wanted” sign DIY’d at Pizza Hut.
Old Style (no, Tom, not the beer):

Small variations between thick and thin strokes. These serifs are smaller than others, with heavy brackets (brackets, it seems, are the flowing areas between the stroke and serif that merge the two shapes together). The stress of the letter (“stress” meaning the angle the imaginary pen that drew the letterform was held at) is at a diagonal.
Transitional:

Greater contrast between thick and thin strokes when compared to Old Style type. The serifs are wider, but with smaller brackets. The x-height is generally larger and the stress of each letterform moves to the vertical.
Modern:

Extreme contrast between thick and thin, almost to the point of blinding you when used in body copy (at least in Bodoni’s case). Serifs are now hairlined without or with very slight brackets. The x-height is generally smaller when compared to Transitional type, though the stress remains vertical.
Slab-Serif:

The contrast to thick and thin moves now in the opposite direction to become largely nonexistent (though still present). The x-height is larger while the serifs become approximate to the width of the stroke of the letterform itself, squaring off at the end. If there is stress in the letterform it is generally vertical.
Sans Serif:

Ahhh Univers. My favorite. Minimal variation from thick to thin, no serifs (thus the name “without serif”), big x-heights, little to no stress and squared terminals (end of the strokes). Geometric simplicity in typographic form.
This week’s assignment gets capped off by creating computer comps of one of each of the hand-drawn layouts for each typeface.
Then, as an added bonus, I was instructed by my syllabus to give the students an in-class assignment. This was essentially high-school art fare with a college typography-class rule set. Using any of the above typefaces, styles, and weights, interpret a single word to communicate both its normal reading pattern as well as its underlying meaning.

I felt like this was a little bit more my speed. Using Garamond Italic, Univers Extended and Condensed, I got a pretty good depiction of “yank.” My favorite details (and yes, it is okay to look at your own work and pick out your favorite parts, no matter what anyone else tells you) are the hooking terminal of the “y” and the rubber-band-snap affecting the letter “n”. The “k” is actually the only thing telling the viewer that this was all once set on a single baseline. This one worked well in class; all my students started trying to figure out the story of the evil “y” grabbing “a” away from “nk,” and what was really happening behind the scenes.
Like many college students, I found myself enlisting some help on this assignment. It wouldn’t be fair of me to take all the credit and pass all the work off as my own. My fellow cheater would like to remain anonymous, however, so I’ll take the blame myself.









Comments (6)
ben Wexlar said:
I think it’s great that you are finally learning the difference between the many serif styles of typefaces. I finished school a few months ago and even though I learned that stuff in my first semester, it has stuck with me ever since, and I am grateful for it.
The lessons you are assigning are interesting, but honestly, a bit simple. My Type 1 course had us working nearly 20 hours a week, and when I sat down to work on your assignments (I actually tried) it took only a fraction of that time. (This may have more to do with the fact that I can practically draw Garamond and Univers from memory at this point.) Do you think your students are incapable of busting their butts?
As for the “yank” composition, I really enjoy it. I feel the snap and truly understand the meaning of the word. My only gripe is that you emphasized where the ‘y’ and ‘a’ overlap with negative space. That ‘y’ should hook the ‘a’ and pull it instead of merging with it. That’s my anal typographic take on it, although I will reiterate that I do like it.
Keep up the good work. It makes me want to teach one day.
Posted on March 28, 2006
Nate Voss said:
Don’t think it’s not embarrassing for a recent graduate to hand you your butt when you’ve been working for 5 years.
I thought it would be a good idea to actually show the differences between the type families, so I’ve added a small section where I felt it would be appropriate. This is by no means complete information; each of these families has a background and history that are left out here. This is just a primer for identification sake.
As for the workload, I went through a similar boot camp at my university. This semester (or quarter, actually) has more of a ramp-up than an all-out bombardment. I find I loose less students that way.
Posted on March 28, 2006
Michael DOgan said:
Will you be handling ligatures at all in that syllabus? I love ligatures! :)
Posted on March 28, 2006
Nate Voss said:
I mentioned ligatures the second class, but only in passing. There’s a big sort of ‘detail, details, details’ class coming up those will work into better. I love the little guys, too.
Posted on March 28, 2006
batteries said:
http://www.batterylaptoppower.com/toshiba/tecra-8100.htm toshiba tecra 8100 battery ,
Posted on November 4, 2008
karry said:
http://www.batterylaptoppower.com/toshiba/pa3399u.htm toshiba pa3399u battery ,
Posted on November 4, 2008